![]() ![]() Zeitschrift für Elektrotechnik und Elektrochemie 12, 909–910. Über die Eigenbewegung der Teilchen in Kolloidalen Lösungen II. Zeitschrift für Elektrotechnik und Elektrochemie 12, 853–860. Über die Eigenbewegung der Teilchen in Kolloidalen Lösungen. The Collaboration of Marian Smoluchowski and Theodor Svedberg on Brownian Motion and Density Fluctuations. 577–602.Įxperimentell nachweisbare, der üblichen Thermodynamik widersprechende Molekularphänomene. Bulletin International de l’académie des sciences de Cracovie, pp. Essai d’une théorie cinétique du mouvement Brownien et des milieux troubles. Simple procedure for correcting equations of evolution: Application to Markov processes. The Global and the Local: The History of Science and the Cultural Integration of Europe.Įinstein’s invention of Brownian motion. The theory of Brownian motion – one hundred years old. Mouvement brownien et réalité moléculaire.Ĭentenary of Marian Smoluchowski’s theory of Brownian Motion. Comptes rendus de l’académie des sciences de Paris 147, 475–476. La loi de Stokes et le mouvement Brownien. Comptes rendus del’académie des sciences de Paris 146, 967–970. L’agitation moléculaire et le mouvement Brownien. The Theory of the Brownian Motion and Statistical Mechanics. On the derivation of distribution functions in problems of Brownian motion. A Perspective on the Scientific Work of Jean Perrin. The origin of the Langevin equation and the calculation of the mean squared displacement: Let’s set the record straight. The British Journal for the History of Science 23, 257–283. Comptes rendus de l’académie des sciences de Paris 146, 530–533. Paul Langevin, le mouvement brownien et l’apparition du bruit blanc. Un essai sur les origines de la théorie mathématique. Speculating about Atoms in Early 20th-century Melbourne: William Sutherland and the Sutherland-Einstein Diffusion Relation, Sutherland Lecture.ġ6th National Congress. Comptes rendus del’académie des sciences de Paris 147, 62–65. Influences des milieux sur les mouvements browniens. Comptes rendus del’académie des sciences de Paris 146, 1024–1026. Comptes Rendus de l’académie des Sciences de Paris 160, 167–168.Įtude cinématographique des mouvements browniens. Doob: Foundations of stochastic processes and probabilistic potential theory. On Boltzmann’s Principle and Some Immediate Consequences Thereof. Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement [Įnglish translation: Dover Publications, Inc., Zeitschrift für Elektrochemie und Angewandte Physikalische Chemie 13, 41–42. Theoretische Bemerkungen über die Brownsche Bewegung. Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen. Einstein, 1905–2005: Poincaré Seminar 2005.īrownian Motion, “Diverse and Undulating”, ![]() Comptes rendus de l’académie des sciences de Paris 147, 131–134. Pressions osmotiques et mouvement brownien. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 72, 69–73. The Brownian Movement and Stochastic Equations. The British Journal for the History of Science 26, 233–234. The case of Brownian motion: a note on Bachelier’s contribution. Atoms, Mechanics, and Probability: Ludwig Boltzmann’s Statistico-Mechanical Writings - An Exegesis. Comptes rendus de l’académie des sciences de Paris 147, 1044–1046. Le mouvement Brownien et la formule d’Einstein. Annales scientifiques de l’École normale supérieure 17, 21–86. We show how Brownian motion became a research topic for the mathematician Wiener in the 1920s, why his model was an idealization of physical experiments, what Ornstein and Uhlenbeck added to Einstein’s results, and how Wiener, Ornstein and Uhlenbeck developed in parallel contradictory theories concerning Brownian velocity. We study the works of Einstein, Smoluchowski, Langevin, Wiener, Ornstein and Uhlenbeck from 1905 to 1934 as well as experimental results, using the concept of Brownian velocity as a leading thread. In this article, we tackle the period straddling the two ‘half-histories’ just mentioned, in order to highlight continuity, to investigate the domain-shift from physics to mathematics, and to survey the enhancements of later physical theories. There is no published work telling its entire history from its discovery until today, but rather partial histories either from 1827 to Perrin’s experiments in the late 1900s, from a physicist’s point of view or from the 1920s from a mathematician’s point of view. Consequently, Brownian motion now refers to the natural phenomenon but also to the theories accounting for it. Interest in Brownian motion was shared by different communities: this phenomenon was first observed by the botanist Robert Brown in 1827, then theorised by physicists in the 1900s, and eventually modelled by mathematicians from the 1920s, while still evolving as a physical theory. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |